Table 1

Differences between characteristics of medical and law students; No (%)

Medical students (M)Law students (L)
Characteristic(nM=127)(nM1=64)(nM2=63)(nL=168)(nL1=75)(nL2=93)p* M/L†
*t-test for age and study year, χ2for others, p shown if ≤0.05 (“–” means p>0.05).
†No significant (p≤0.05) differences were found when comparing groups from the same faculty, except for ethical training of medical students (p<0.001).
‡Self-reported identification with cultural origin. Some students did not indicate their culture.
§Medical students indicated participation either in the medical ethics seminary taught to 2nd year students or in the ethics part of the legal medicine course. Law students: various kinds of teaching in high school or in other, e.g. philosophical or theological, faculties.
Group M1 : 64 medical students at the end of their 5th year in 1996.
Group M2 : 63 medical students at the beginning of their 5th year in 1996.
Group L1 : 75 first to fourth year law students from an “international law” lecture in 1996.
Group L2 : 93 mostly first year law students from a “law and medicine” lecture in 1996.
Authors’ note: This table is adapted from one already published in Medical Education.24
Mean age (SD)24.4 (8.2)24.7 (3.8)24.2 (2.4)22.1 (4.1)22.1 (1.5)22.1 (5.3)<0.001
Minimum/maximum21/5222/5221/3518/5219/2818/52
Study year,5.0 (0.09)5.0 (0.1)5.0 (0.0)1.7 (0.8)2.4 (5.9)1.1 (6.2)<0.001
mode/range5/15/15/01/42/21/4
Ethical training§75 (59.5)58 (90.6)17 (27.0)13 (7.9)4 (5.3)9 (10.0)<0.001
Culture‡:
    USA/Canada5 (4.1)1 (1.6)4 (6.6)6 (3.6)2 (2.7)4 (4.4)
    North-Europe10 (8.1)6 (9.7)4 (6.6)27 (16.3)16 (21.3)11 (12.1)0.04
    Switzerland85 (69.1)47 (75.8)38 (62.3)91 (54.8)40 (53.3)51 (56.0)0.01
    South-Europe15 (12.2)5 (8.1)10 (16.4)29 (17.5)11 (14.7)18 (19.8)
    Other8 (6.5)3 (4.8)5 (8.2)13 (7.8)6 (8.0)7 (7.7)