Table 2

Judgements of acceptability of methods of allocation in a clinical trial context by participant who correctly judged the methods as random or non-random

Method of allocationCorrectly judging as random (n)No justification for randomisationCERES justification for randomisationDifference 95% CI
AcceptableNot acceptableAcceptableNot acceptable
n (%)95% CIn (%)n (%)95% CIn (%)
*Missing data n = 2; †missing data, n = 3; applies to those who gave correct judgements of random allocation methods.
CI, confidence interval.
Computer11020 (37.7)25.9 to 51.233 (62.3)*32 (58.2)45.0 to 70.323 (41.8)−0.373 to −0.016
Toss coin9613 (27.7)16.9 to 41.834 (72.3)†15 (32.6)20.9 to 47.031 (67.4)–0.229 to 0.134
Draw out of hat10419 (35.8)24.3 to 49.334 (64.2)*17 (34.7)22.9 to 48.732 (65.3)–0.170 to 0.190
Ask which prefer10639 (75.0)61.8 to 84.813 (25.0)32 (60.4)46.9 to 72.421 (39.6)–0.032 to 0.312