TY - JOUR T1 - Dutch practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide: a glimpse at the edges of the practice JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics DO - 10.1136/medethics-2018-104759 SP - medethics-2018-104759 AU - Timothy Quill Y1 - 2018/02/02 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2018/02/02/medethics-2018-104759.abstract N2 - Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) was openly permitted but not technically legal in the Netherlands for decades. In 2002, it was formally legalised through the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Review Procedures Act, subject to two main criteria: (1) the patient had to be capable of making voluntary decisions and (2) the patient had to experience unbearable suffering without prospect of improvement. Within the Netherlands, EAS has wide acceptance, and the public in general seems to favour a liberal interpretation of both of these requirements. Physicians are expected to use ‘their own moral compass’ to decide about personal participation, and it is generally possible and permissible to find a substitute physician if the patient meets the legally required criteria but the physician is not comfortable assisting. Over the years, multiple quantitative and qualitative studies have explored the Dutch practice of EAS,1–3 but relatively little is known about the edges of what counts as meeting these criteria and how acceptable the practice is for physicians who participate. The study by Snijdewind et al gives a glimpse of these boundaries and suggests that at least sometimes the criteria are being stretched and adapted to meet the perceived needs of patients, and some participating physicians are relatively uncomfortable with some of the requests with which they are faced.4 Just how rare or common these ‘edgy’ cases are within the larger practice of EAS in the Netherlands cannot be answered by … ER -