Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees

J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):591-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100679. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

Abstract

Background: Payment of research participants helps to increase recruitment for research studies, but can pose ethical dilemmas. Research ethics committees (RECs) have a centrally important role in guiding this practice, but standardisation of the ethical approval process in Ireland is lacking.

Aim: Our aim was to examine REC policies, experiences and concerns with respect to the payment of participants in research projects in Ireland.

Method: Postal survey of all RECs in Ireland.

Results: Response rate was 62.5% (n=50). 80% of RECs reported not to have any established policy on the payment of research subjects while 20% had refused ethics approval to studies because the investigators proposed to pay research participants. The most commonly cited concerns were the potential for inducement and undermining of voluntary consent.

Conclusions: There is considerable variability among RECs on the payment of research participants and a lack of clear consensus guidelines on the subject. The development of standardised guidelines on the payment of research subjects may enhance recruitment of research participants.

Keywords: Ethics Committees/Consultation; Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/Review Cttes.; Research Ethics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ethics Committees, Research / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Ethics, Research
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Human Experimentation / ethics*
  • Humans
  • Ireland
  • Motivation
  • Research Subjects / economics*
  • Research Subjects / supply & distribution