Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Genome-based pharmacogenetics and the pharmaceutical industry

Key Points

  • Whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mapping to determine pharmacogenetic profiles for the response of patients to drugs is in progress.

  • Because of the scant amount of published data that describe high-density SNP mapping for the identification of complex susceptibility-gene variants, as well as responses to medicines, examples of SNP-mapping strategies for testing the hypothesis that whole-genome SNP profiling is practical are drawn from work carried out at GlaxoSmithKline.

  • Two examples of adverse-event pharmacogenetics, which highlight the potential speed and utility of these methods in drug development and surveillance, are described.

  • Use of SNP profiling of patients for efficacy pharmacogenetics — with the goal of decreasing the size, complexity, time and expense of clinical trials — is described and contrasted with post-marketing surveillance for adverse-event pharmacogenetic applications.

  • Proposed methodologies for applying SNP-mapping pharmacogenetics for prediction of efficacy and adverse events for individual subjects is summarized.

  • Detailed statistical methods for analysis will be derived empirically, using actual high-density SNP-association data in conjunction with other proposals for statistical evaluation in the literature. Determining a defined pharmacogenetic profile, which contains many variables for high statistical matching, and comparing it with each individual is analogous to current statistical 'forensic' applications of polymorphism screening, in which DNA from two sources can be determined with extraordinary statistical significance.

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic capabilities have changed markedly since The SNP Consortium made a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map freely available in 2001. For more than 40 years, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug-metabolizing molecules were the focus of practical applications. Today, it is possible to use SNP-mapping technologies to create a genetic profile of each individual that can be used to identify patterns of susceptibility genes for common diseases as well as genetic risk/efficacy factors that are related to the effects of drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Genetic markers in the HLA-B region that are associated with hypersensitivity to abacavir.
Figure 2: Bilirubin levels pre- and post-treatment in 1,400 individuals from a Phase III clinical trial of Tranilast.
Figure 3: Relationship between genotype and response to Tranilast or placebo.
Figure 4: Example of between-chip reproducibility of proteomic mass spectra.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Motulsky, A. J. Pharmacogenetics and ecogenetics in 1991. Pharmacogenetics 1, 2–3 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfsot, D. R., Boyce-Jacino, M. T., & Grant, D. M. A SNPshot: pharmacogenetics and the future of drug therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 18, 334–338 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, R. & Aronson, J. K. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 356, 1255–1259 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLeod, H. L. & Evans, W. E. Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 101–121 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadee, W. Pharmacogenomics: using genetic information to optimize drug therapy. Medscape Pharmacotherapy [online] (cited 10 Jun. 02) (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurth, J. H. Pharmacogenomics: future promise of a tool for identifying patients at risk. Drug Info. J. 34, 223–227 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roses, A. D. Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature 405, 857–865 (2000).An early review of high-density SNP-mapping technologies, with discussion of ethical considerations of pharmacogenetic SNP mapping compared with disease-gene identification.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roses, A. D. Pharmacogenetics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2261–2267 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, W. E. & Johnson, J. A. Pharmacogenomics: the inherited basis for interindividual differences in drug response. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2, 9–39 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pirmohamed, M. & Park, B. K. Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 298–305 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiijal, B. A., Hall, J. M. & Witte, J. S. Clinical trials in the genomic era: effects of protective genotypes on sample size and duration of trial. Control. Clin. Trials 21, 7–20 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B. H., & Corey, P. N. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279, 1200–1205 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffries, D. B., Leakey, D., Lewis, J. A., Payne, S. & Rawlins, M. D. New active substances authorized in the United Kingdom between 1972 and 1994. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45, 151–156 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pirmohamed, M., Breckenridge, A. M., Kitteringham, N. R., & Park, B. K. Adverse drug reactions. BMJ 316, 1295–1298 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wieczorek, S. J. & Tsongalis, G. J. Pharmacogenomics: will it change the field of medicine? Clin. Chim. Acta 308, 1–8 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lesko, L. J. & Woodcock, J. Pharmacogenomic-guided drug development: regulatory perspective. Pharmacogenomics J. 2, 20–24 (2002).An influential article, which was written by FDA Directors, which invited proposals using SNP-mapping pharmacogenetic technologies, and changed the perception of a widely held view outside the FDA that regulators would not consider such applications.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. The SNP Consortium. 〈http://snp.cshl.org/index.html〉 (2002).

  18. Roses, A. D. Pharmacogenetics place in modern medical science and practice. Life Sci. 70, 1471–1480 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai, E., Riley, J., Purvis, I. & Roses, A. D. A 4-Mb high-density single nucleotide polymorphism-based map around human APOE. Genomics 54, 31–38 (1998)The first high-density SNP map that was constructed as a proof of principle for LD mapping around a known susceptibility gene — to test whether the APOE4 polymorphism, which is associated with an increased risk of AD, would have been identified more rapidly by using SNP LD-association mapping.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roses, A. D. Apolipoprotein E alleles as risk factors in Alzheimer's disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 47, 387–400 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrer, L. A. et al. Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA 278, 1349–1356 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, M. X. et al. The APOE ɛ4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer disease among African Americans, whites, and Hispanics. JAMA 279, 751–755 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Graff-Radford, N. R. et al. Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease in African American subjects. Arch. Neurol. 59, 594–600 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kardaun, J. W. et al. Genotypes and phenotypes for apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease in the Honolulu–Asia aging study. Clin. Chem. 46, 1548–1554 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin, E. R. et al. SNPing away at complex diseases: analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms around APOE in Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 383–394 (2000).A detailed analysis of the first high-density SNP map around the APOE gene, which was carried out as a proof of principle in reference 19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin, E. R. et al. Analysis of association at SNPs in the APOE region. Genomics 63, 7–12 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCarthy, L. C. et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism alleles in the insulin receptor gene are associated with typical migraine. Genomics 78, 135–149 (2001).The insulin receptor was the first susceptibility gene for a complex disease that was identified using high-density SNP mapping of a genetic-linkage region.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hewett, D. et al. Identification of a psoriasis susceptibility candidate gene by linkage disequilibrium mapping with a localized single nucleotide polymorphism map. Genomics 79, 305–314 (2002).This research identifies a gene that contains specific SNP associations with psoriasis, and defines a gene that was not a previous disease susceptibility candidate.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rioux, J. D. et al. Genetic variation in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster confers susceptibility to Crohn disease. Nature Genet. 29, 223–228 (2001).The identification of a region using SNP mapping that contains a gene cluster that is associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergstresser, P. R. Sensitization and elicitation of inflammation in contact dermatitis. Immunol. Ser. 46, 219–245 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fleming, C. J., Burden, A. D. & Forsyth, A. The genetics of allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel. Contact Dermatitis 41, 251–253 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ardlie, K. G., Kruglyak, L. & Seielstad, M. Patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 299–309 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cantor, C. Whole genome SNP scans: the reality. The Human Genome Organisation [online] (cited 31 May 2002) (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Foster, R. H. & Foulds, D. Abacavir. Drugs 55, 729–736 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Symonds, W. et al. Risk factor analysis for hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. Clin. Ther. (in the press).

  36. Hetherington, S. W. et al. Hypersensitivity reactions during therapy with abacavir: analysis of 636 cases for clinical presentation and risk factors. [online] (cited 31 May 2002) 7th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brew, B. J. et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abacavir (ABC 1592) in HIV-1 infected subjects with AIDS dementia complex (CNA3001). 12th World AIDS Conference Abstract 32,192 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brinkman, K., Smeitink, J. A., Romijn, A., & Reiss, P. Mitochondrial toxicity induced by nucleoside-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors is a key factor in the pathogenesis of antiretroviral-therapy-related lipodystrophy. Lancet 354, 1112–1115 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hetherington, S. et al. Genetic variations in HLA-B region and hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. Lancet 359, 1121–1122 (2002).This paper shows that several polymorphisms in a region of extended LD confer susceptibility to the HSR to abacavir, using a list of candidate genes that are thought to be involved in immunological disorders. By chance, SNPs from two distinct genes were in extended LD, and so defined a larger-than-expected region, which shows that estimates of the number of SNPs that are needed for whole-genome screening profiles might be too large.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mallal, S. et al. Association between the presence of HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-GQ3 and hypersensitivity to HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase inhibitor abacavir. Lancet 359, 727–732 (2002).These independent experiments look at specific HLA regions as candidate sets of polymorphisms for association to the HSR to abacavir and, along with reference 39 , provide immediate published confirmation of this LD region.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Monaghan, G., Ryan, M., Seddon, H. R. & Burchell, B. Genetic variation in bilirubin UPD-glucuronosyltransferase gene promoter and Gilbert's syndrome. Lancet 347, 578–581 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aono, S. et al. Analysis of genes for bilirubin UPD-glucuronosyltransferase in Gilbert's syndrome. Lancet 345, 958–959 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bosma, P. J. et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert's syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1171–1175 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bosma, P. J. et al. Sequence of exons and the flanking region of human bilirubin–UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene complex and identification of a genetic mutation in a patient with Crigler–Najjar syndrome, type I. Hepatology 15, 941–947 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roses, A. D. Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery. Lancet 355, 1358–1361 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Petricoin, E. F. et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 359, 572–577 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Buchanan, A. et al. Pharmacogenetics: ethical issues and policy options. Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. (in the press).

  48. Robertson, J. A. Pharmacogenetic challenges for the health care system. Health Affairs (in the press).

  49. Wolf, C. R., Smith, G. & Smith, R. L. Science, medicine and the future: pharmacogenetics. BMJ 320, 987–990 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ingelman-Sundberg, M. Pharmacogenetics: an opportunity for a safer and more efficient pharmacotherapy. J. Int. Med. 250, 186–200 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Park, K. B. & Pirmohamed, M. Toxicogenetics in drug development. Toxicol. Lett. 120, 281–291 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cardon, L. R. et al. Testing drug response in the presence of genetic information: sampling issues for clinical trials. Pharmacogenetics 10, 503–510 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.D.R. acknowledges the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) department heads and project leaders whose teams contributed to the experiments and examples described in this review: D. Burns, D. Campbell, R. Dement, A. Hughes, E. Lai, P. Manasco, A. McCarthy, I. Purvis, J. Riley, A. Saunders, S. Sehgal, Y. Smithies and N. Spurr. Also, the many scientists involved in creating the SNP mapping strategy and capability within GSK; T. Isenhour and E. McPherson, who assisted in preparing and editing the manuscript; A. Holden and D. Wang, who accelerated The SNP Consortium to be on time, under budget and to exceed all expectations; and M. McPeak, E. Haner, M. Beadle and S. Groh, who contributed support for team coordination. J. Niedel, T. Yamada, A. Hennah, J. Palmer, J. Robinson, B. Koch and K. Spitz provided essential early and continued support for pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in the Genetics Research Directorate in GSK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Cancer.gov

ovarian cancer

LocusLink

APOC1

APOE

HLA-A

HLA-B

HLA-DR

TNF-α

UGT1

Medscape DrugInfo

abacavir

OMIM

Alzheimer's disease

Crigler–Najjar syndrome type I

Crohn's disease

Gilbert's syndrome

psoriasis

sickle-cell disease

FURTHER INFORMATION

The Human Genome Project

The SNP Consortium

The Wellcome Trust

LINKS

Applied Biosystems

GlaxoSmithKline

Illumina

Orchid BioSciences

Roche Diagnostics

Sequenom

Glossary

SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM

(SNP). A specific location in a DNA sequence at which different people have different DNA bases. This can change the protein sequence, leading to disease (for example, sickle-cell disease), or have no known consequences.

SNP MAPPING

A linear map of SNPs across the genome allows genetic traits to be localized by statistical association to the specific region of the genome that is marked by the SNP or several SNPs nearby. In the cases of complex diseases or responses to medicine, multiple SNP markers in several specific regions of the genome act as markers that are associated with the phenotype (disease or drug response).

CANDIDATE-GENE ASSOCIATIONS

A candidate gene is frequently indicated by previous hypotheses or genetic-linkage studies. Gene variants can cause or enhance susceptibility to a disease or drug-response phenotype.

SNP-LINKAGE MAPPING PANEL

The collection of SNPs that defines the linear map of the genome that is being studied. To localize the APOE gene, these SNPs would be located on chromosome 19. For HLA-B57, the SNPs are located on chromosome 6. To find other unknown regions, a SNP mapping panel that covers the whole genome can be used.

LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM

(LD). Defines a region of allele (or inherited-variation) sharing along a relatively small length of the genome. If there is an association with one marker, then the likelihood of association with another marker within that region is increased.

PENETRANT GENETIC DISEASES

Describes the expression of the phenotype that results from the inheritance of disease-associated or phenotype-associated alleles. Some diseases have relatively highly penetrant mutant alleles, such as Huntington's disease. Penetrance of other traits, such as eye colour or late-onset Alzheimer's disease, might be due to combinations of less-penetrant polymorphic alleles found at several locations along the genome.

AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE

A mode of inheritance that requires that the mutation of a single gene is present on both paternally and maternally derived alleles for the clinical phenotype to be expressed.

AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT

A mode of inheritance that requires that the mutation of a single gene is present on either of the paternally and maternally derived alleles for the clinical phenotype to be expressed.

SNP PRINTsm

Describes the pattern of inheriting SNP variations from a panel of SNPs. In the case of SNP mapping along the whole genome, it is analogous to the detection of highly private sets of traits, such as those that determine fingerprints, which make individuals unique. In the case of pharmacogenetics, it is the specific set of measured SNPs that define a drug response, and which can therefore be abstracted from the whole map to develop a more simple medicine-response profile.

MEDICINE-RESPONSE PROFILE

(MRP). A test or set of tests that indicates the likely response of a patient to a medicine. In the context of developing a test from a SNP Printsm, the test might be the selection of SNPs from the genome scan that are associated with the phenotypic response; for example, adverse event.

HYPERBILIRUBINAEMIA

Bilirubin is a metabolite of cholesterol, and its elevation above normal serum levels is called hyperbilirubinaemia. This state can be caused by several liver- and gall-bladder-related problems.

CLUSTER ANALYSIS

A formal method of statistical analysis that can be used to determine the significance of clusters of data points. For example, the clustering of disease-associated SNP variants in a region of LD, or the identification of multiple regions of nearby SNP variants (LD) at particular locations along the genome that defines a high probability that a specific drug response will occur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roses, A. Genome-based pharmacogenetics and the pharmaceutical industry. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1, 541–549 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd840

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing