Skip to main content
Log in

Is It Me or My Brain? Depression and Neuroscientific Facts

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers the roles played by brain images (e.g., from PET scans) in mass media as experienced by people suffering from mental illness, and as used by scientists and activist groups in demonstrating a biological basis for mental illness. Examining the rhetorical presentation of images in magazines and books, the article describes the persuasive power that brain images have in altering the understanding people have of their own body—their “objective self.” Analyzing first-person accounts of encounters with brain images, it argues that people come to understand themselves as having neurotransmitter imbalances that are the cause of their illnesses via received facts and images of the brain, but that this understanding is incomplete and in tension with the sense that they are their brain. The article concludes by querying the emergence of a “pharmaceutical self,” in which one experiences one's brain as if on drugs, as a new form of objective self-fashioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, L. (1984). Essays on ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braude, A. (1989). Radical spirits: Spiritualism and women's rights in nineteenth century America. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner, C., & Press, N. (1996). Production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10(2), 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlong, R. (Ed). (1999). States of mind: New discoveries about how our brains make us who we are. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1996). (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. (1995). Twenty-first-centure PET: Looking for mind and morality through the eye of technology. In G. Marcus (Eds.), Technoscientific imaginaries: Conversations, profiles, and memoirs (pp. 87–128). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. (1997). A digital image of the category of the person: PET scanning and objective self-fashioning. In G. L Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs & citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 83–102). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. (2000). When explanations rest: ‘Good-enough’ brain science and the new sociomedical disorders. In M. Lock, A. Young, & A. Cambrosio (Eds.), Living and working in the new medical technologies (pp. 209–232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1988). Disease and representation: Images of illness from madness to AIDS. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, M. D. V., Munakata, T., Kobayashi, Y., Mattingly, C., & Good, B. (1994). Oncology and narrative time. Social Science and Medicine, 38(6), 855–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. (1987). Medicine, mind, and the double brain: A study in nineteenth century thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D. (1997). Bodies, antibodies, and modest interventions. In G. L. Downey, & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 67–82). Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixson, J. R. (1983, July). New seeing-eye machines...look inside your body, can save your life. Vogue, 238–239, 254–258.

  • Holland, D. C., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, K. R. (1995). A magical orange grove in a nightmare: Creativity and mood disorders. In R. Conlan & J. A. Hobson, States of mind: New discoveries about how our brains make us who we are (pp. 53–80). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1985). The brain machine: The development of neurophysiological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. (1992). Motivated models. In R. G. D'Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 181–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makela, K., Alcoholics Anonymous, & World Health Organization. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual-help movement: A study in eight societies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1994). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (1994). The concept of therapeutic “emplotment.” Social Science and Medicine, 38(6), 811–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Insanity Defense. (1983). Myths & realities: Hearing transcript of the National Commission on the Insanity Defense. Sponsored by the National Mental Health Association.

  • National Institute of Mental Health. (2002). Website http://www.nimh.nih.gov/notsci/depress.htm. Accessed 7/1/2002.

  • Pechura, C. M., & Martin, J. B. (Eds.). Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on a National Neural Circuitry Database. (1991). Mapping the brain and its functions: Integrating enabling technologies into neuroscience research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

  • Pêcheux, M. (1982). Language, semantics, and ideology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1992). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In J. C. S. Kwinter (Ed.), Incorporations (pp. 190–201). New York: Zone (distrib: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajchman, J. (1985). Michel Foucault: The freedom of philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1998). Real time fetus: The role of the sonogram in the age of monitored reproduction. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 31–48). Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohat, E. (1993, Fall). Lasers-for-ladies: Endo discourse and the inscriptions of science (The realization of endometriosis as a real disease). Camera Obscura, 29, 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1992). Inhibition: History and meaning in the sciences of mind and brain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S. (1998). Image of contradiction: Obstetrical ultrasound in American culture. In S. Franklin, & H. Ragone (Eds.), Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation (pp. 15–45). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T. (1995). The beast: A reckoning with depression. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whybrow, P. C. (1998). A mood apart: A thinker's guide to emotion and its disorders. London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1957 [1938]). Modes of thought. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations, Part I. Oxford: B. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1991). On certainty. San Francisco: Arion Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Dumit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumit, J. Is It Me or My Brain? Depression and Neuroscientific Facts. Journal of Medical Humanities 24, 35–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021353631347

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021353631347

Navigation