Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 382, Issue 9898, 28 September–4 October 2013, Pages 1080-1081
The Lancet

Comment
Elimination of female genital mutilation/cutting

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61532-9Get rights and content

References (5)

  • Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change

    (2013)
  • Intensifying global efforts for the elimination of female genital mutilations

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

  • Epidemiology, regional characteristics, knowledge, and attitude toward female genital mutilation/cutting in southern Iran

    2015, Journal of Sexual Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    We use the expression preferred by United Nation's International Children's Emergency Fund and United Nation's Population Fund, the two central policymakers in the global effort to end the practice, “female genital mutilation/cutting” (FGM/C) [1]. Since the early 1970s, Western efforts to end FGM/C have relied primarily on two frames that have influenced the discourse of FGM/C and, in turn, the ideological contestation over the practice [4,5]. FGM/C has not only been associated with violation of human rights, but has also been shown to be associated with impaired physical and mental health [6,7].

  • Female genital mutilation

    2017, Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecologia
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text