eLetters

416 e-Letters

  • A brief clarification in response
    Tom Koch
    Dear Editor

    In this journal's recent symposium on disability Prof. John Harris vigorously defended his general view on "disability" and "harm" before a range of critics, including me. This letter is not offered as a rejoinder to his argument but instead presents a brief clarification of a point he obviously misinterpreted.

    A part of my argument for the protection of persons of difference - especially tho...

    Show More
  • Bad behaviour does not equal research fraud
    Bob Williamson
    Dear Editor,

    I was not impressed by Dr Geggie’s article offering a survey of the attitudes of newly appointed consultants towards research fraud (J. Med. Ethics 2001; 27:344-346). Indeed, by mixing up categories of misconduct from what is at most “bad behaviour” to the very serious, he is not entirely beyond reproach himself. I remind readers that Dr Geggie suggested that 55.7% of the respondents had observed (from the tit...

    Show More
  • Substance misuse and unethical behaviour
    Wouter Havinga
    Dear Editor

    Further research is needed into the effects of alcohol and drugs, and in particular opiates on suppressing morality. Alcohol is often involved in emotionally charged acts of violence where as opiates in calculated, 'callous' acts of violence. Therefore, substance misuse or susceptibility to dependency are factors that need specific attention when assessing the risk for unethical behaviour.

  • PNAJ: please, no abbreviations in Journal
    Neville W Goodman

    Sir,

    Could I make a request of the newly installed editor, whose first editorial is titled 'Future directions of the journal'? A direction I would not wish to see is towards more and more abbreviations. They serve little purpose other than to save printer's ink. [1] Looking through volume 27, issue 3, there are a number of abbreviations better replaced by the parent phrase or a contraction of it. Embryonic and f...

    Show More
  • the meaning of mind
    David Herman

    Dear Editor,

    Prof. Fulford endorsed Dr. Thomas Szasz's book THE MEANING OF MIND:

    "Within the broad church of anti-psychiatry, Thomas Szasz has been foremost in challenging a narrowly biological conception of human nature. Provocative, thoughtful, and highly readable, The Meaning of Mind extends his arguments to the bleak redunctionism implicit in modern neuroscience. This is a timely stand against what C....

    Show More
  • The strict meaning of 'disease'
    David Herman

    Dr. Mortimer J. Adler says:

    "It is clear that in the strict meaning of 'disease' only the body can suffer lesions; the intellect as such cannot be diseased, though it can be affected by a diseased body."

    This supports Dr. Thomas Szasz's interpretation of mental illness as a metaphor.

    Adler, M.J. 1937. WHAT MAN HAS MADE OF MAN, page 204

    Szasz, T.S. 1961 THE MYTH OF MENTAL ILLNESS...

    Show More

Pages