Article info
PDFResponse
Response to Sheehan et al’s ‘In defence of governance: ethics review and social research’
- Correspondence to Professor Martyn Hammersley, WELS, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK; m.hammersley{at}open.ac.uk
Citation
Response to Sheehan et al’s ‘In defence of governance: ethics review and social research’
Publication history
- Received November 14, 2017
- Accepted December 8, 2017
- First published January 27, 2018.
Online issue publication
August 21, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Life in the cloud and freedom of speech
- Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto
- 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues
- Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
- How not to argue against mandatory ethics review
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol
- Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study
- Research ethics in dissertations: ethical issues and complexity of reasoning
- Should all medical research be published? The moral responsibility of medical journal editors