Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: Response
Identity, personhood and the law: a response to Ashcroft and McGee
- Correspondence to Dr Charles Foster, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, St Cross Building, St Cross Road, Oxford GB OX1 3UL, UK; charles.foster{at}gtc.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Identity, personhood and the law: a response to Ashcroft and McGee
Publication history
- Received October 17, 2017
- Accepted November 2, 2017
- First published December 7, 2017.
Online issue publication
December 18, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 December 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on medical law
- Ethics briefings
- Simple rationality? The law of healthcare resource allocation in England
- Dignity and the use of body parts
- Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control
- Ethics briefing
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law