Article Text

PDF
Objections still fail: a response to Faria
  1. Gardar Arnason
  1. Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gardar Arnason, Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Gartenstrasse 47, 72074 Tübingen, Germany; gardar.arnason{at}uni-tuebingen.de

Abstract

In her reply to my critical assessment of objections to the Weatherall report’s justification of non-human primate (NHP) research, Catia Faria focuses on three objections which she entitles ‘the disanalogy’, ‘the utilitarian calculus’ and ‘species overlap’. Faria finds my assessment unconvincing, butI argue that the objections still fail.

  • research ethics
  • animal experimentation
  • moral status
  • non-human primates
  • weatherall report

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This workwas supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) research unit grant FOR1847

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles