Article Text

PDF
Sometimes, not always, not never: a response to Pickard and Pearce
  1. Patrick J Sullivan
  1. School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr Patrick J Sullivan, School of Law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK; Patrick.Sullivan-2{at}postgrad.manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper provides a response to Hanna Pickard and Stephen Pearce’s paper ‘Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings.’ This paper responded to my article ‘Should healthcare professionals sometimes allow harm? The case of self-injury.’ There is much in the paper that I would agree with, but I feel it is important to respond to a number of the criticisms of my paper in order to clarify my position and to facilitate ongoing debate in relation to this important issue.

  • autonomy
  • paternalism

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.