Article Text

PDF
Paper
Ethical behaviour of physicians and psychologists: similarities and differences
  1. Michall Ferencz Kaddari1,2,
  2. Meni Koslowsky1,3,
  3. Michael A Weingarten4
  1. 1Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
  2. 2Interdisciplinary Center, Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Herzliya, Israel
  3. 3Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
  4. 4Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michall Ferencz Kaddari, Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya, Israel; mferencz2012{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective To compare the coping patterns of physicians and clinical psychologists when confronted with clinical ethical dilemmas and to explore consistency across different dilemmas.

Population 88 clinical psychologists and 149 family physicians in Israel.

Method Six dilemmas representing different ethical domains were selected from the literature. Vignettes were composed for each dilemma, and seven possible behavioural responses for each were proposed, scaled from most to least ethical. The vignettes were presented to both family physicians and clinical psychologists.

Results Psychologists’ aggregated mean ethical intention score, as compared with the physicians, was found to be significantly higher (F(6, 232)=22.44, p<0.001, η2=0.37). Psychologists showed higher ethical intent for two dilemmas: issues of payment (they would continue treating a non-paying patient while physicians would not) and dual relationships (they would avoid treating the son of a colleague). In the other four vignettes, psychologists and physicians responded in much the same way. The highest ethical intent scores for both psychologists and physicians were for confidentiality and a colleague's inappropriate practice due to personal problems.

Conclusions Responses to the dilemmas by physicians and psychologists can be categorised into two groups: (1) similar behaviours on the part of both professions when confronting dilemmas concerning confidentiality, inappropriate practice due to personal problems, improper professional conduct and academic issues and (2) different behaviours when confronting either payment issues or dual relationships.

  • ethical dilemmas
  • ethical intent
  • physicians
  • psychologists
  • payment
  • dual relationships

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Ethics Committee Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.