Article info
PDFEditorial
What has philosophy got to do it? Conflicting views and values in end-of-life care
- Correspondence to Professor Dominic Wilkinson, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes St, Oxford, OX1 1PT, UK; dominic.wilkinson{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
What has philosophy got to do it? Conflicting views and values in end-of-life care
Publication history
- Received June 14, 2017
- Accepted July 9, 2017
- First published August 9, 2017.
Online issue publication
December 21, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 December 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Systematic review of general practice end-of-life symptom control
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- General practice physicians’ and nurses’ self-reported multidisciplinary end-of-life care: a systematic review
- Older adults’ medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation
- Safeguarding choice at the end of life
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
- The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial
- Palliative sedation: ethics in clinical practice guidelines – systematic review