Article Text
PDFEditorial
What has philosophy got to do it? Conflicting views and values in end-of-life care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
↵i Gawande is also coauthor of one of the documents analysed by Kamm.
Twitter @Neonatalethics
Funding DW was supported for this work by a grant from the Wellcome Trust WT106587/Z/14/Z.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Systematic review of general practice end-of-life symptom control
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- General practice physicians’ and nurses’ self-reported multidisciplinary end-of-life care: a systematic review
- Older adults’ medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation
- Safeguarding choice at the end of life
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
- The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial
- Palliative sedation: ethics in clinical practice guidelines – systematic review