Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Correspondence to Dr William Simkulet, 311 Sunnyslope Ct. S, Andover, Kansas, LS 67002, USA; Simkuletwm{at}yahoo.com
Citation
Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
Publication history
- Received October 21, 2016
- Revised June 13, 2017
- Accepted July 11, 2017
- First published August 9, 2017.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 October 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- The Two tragedies argument
- Within the limits of the defensible: a response to Simkulet’s argument against the pro-life view on the basis of spontaneous abortion
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter
- The inconsistency argument: why apparent pro-life inconsistency undermines opposition to induced abortion
- Inconsistency arguments still do not matter
- Two Tragedies Argument: Two Mistakes
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Responding to Simkulet’s objections to the two tragedies argument
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience