Article Text

PDF
The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
  1. Geoff Keeling
  1. Correspondence to Geoff Keeling, Department of Philosophy, Cotham House, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK; geoff.keeling.2016{at}my.bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

Is there a moral difference between euthanasia for terminally ill adults and euthanasia for terminally ill children? Luc Bovens considers five arguments to this effect, and argues that each is unsuccessful. In this paper, I argue that Bovens' dismissal of the sensitivity argument is unconvincing.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.