Article Text

PDF
Aspects of disaster research ethics applicable to other contexts
  1. Bridget Haire
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bridget Haire, Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; b.haire{at}unsw.edu.au

Abstract

In his article ‘The Ebola Clinical Trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters’, Philippe Calain constructs a compelling case as to why and how experiences from the recent Ebola epidemic should be used to develop a framework for disaster research ethics. In particular, Calain proposes a useful model for assessing whether or not an unproven intervention could be suitable for human use in a disaster context, and makes a powerful argument against the separation of patient care from research goals. In this commentary, I argue that the separation of patient care goals from research goals is also unhelpful in the context of other forms of participant disadvantage even when that disadvantage is less severe than an ongoing public health emergency. I contend that recognising that research in disadvantaged populations is an intervention that could and should aim to produce positive outcomes for participants, just as it should in disaster contexts, therefore seems a well-justified lesson that can be extrapolated from the experience of the Ebola epidemic.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding National Health and Medical Research Council (grant no. RG 150825).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles