Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: responses
Force-feeding, hunger strikes, Guantanamo and autonomy: replies to George Annas, Charles Foster and Michael Gross
- Correspondence to Dr Mirko D Garasic, Tel Aviv University, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; mdgarasic{at}fulbrightmail.org
Citation
Force-feeding, hunger strikes, Guantanamo and autonomy: replies to George Annas, Charles Foster and Michael Gross
Publication history
- Received July 10, 2016
- Accepted August 4, 2016
- First published October 6, 2016.
Online issue publication
December 15, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 December 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- US military medical ethics in the War on Terror
- The physician and prison hunger strikes: reflecting on the experience in Turkey
- A matter of life and death
- Compulsory treatment: ask who the patient really is. A response to Mirko Garasic
- A simple solution to the puzzles of end of life? Voluntary palliated starvation
- Force-feeding at Guantanamo
- Garasic review, Guantanamo and other cases of enforced medical treatment
- Hunger striking prisoners: the doctors' dilemma
- Physicians’ ethical obligations to hunger strikers
- The implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hunger strikers