Article info
PDFPaper
Amoral enhancement
- Correspondence to Saskia E Verkiel, Neuroscience Institute, College of Arts & Sciences, Georgia State University, 100 Piedmont Ave SE, Atlanta, GA30303, USA; saskia.verkiel{at}gmail.com
Citation
Amoral enhancement
Publication history
- Received December 20, 2015
- Revised July 19, 2016
- Accepted August 7, 2016
- First published October 6, 2016.
Online issue publication
February 18, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 December 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Freedom and moral enhancement
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?