Article Text
Abstract
Current guidelines on consenting individuals to participate in genomic research are diverse. This creates problems for participants and also for researchers, particularly for clinicians who provide both clinical care and research to their patients. A group of 14 stakeholders met on 7 October 2015 in Exeter to discuss the ethical issues and the best practice arising in clinically based genomic research, with particular emphasis on the issue of returning results to study participants/patients in light of research findings affecting research and clinical practices. The group was deliberately multidisciplinary to ensure that a diversity of views was represented. This report outlines the main ethical issues, areas of best practice and principles underlying ethical clinically based genomic research discussed during the meeting. The main point emerging from the discussion is that ethical principles, rather than being formulaic, should guide researchers/clinicians to identify who the main stakeholders are to consult with for a specific project and to incorporate their voices/views strategically throughout the lifecycle of each project. We believe that the mix of principles and practical guidelines outlined in this report can contribute to current debates on how to conduct ethical clinically based genomic research.
- Clinical Ethics
- Genethics
- Patient perspective
- Research Ethics
- Regulation
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors All authors listed contributed to the drafting of the report. CB, GW, TA, DC and SK designed the original project and organised the stakeholder event.
Funding Economic and Social Research Council (Impact Accelerator Account SL-06879)
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Other content recommended for you
- Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents
- Ethical navigation of biobanking establishment in Ukraine: learning from the experience of developing countries
- Guideline for feedback of individual genetic research findings for genomics research in Africa
- Researchers’ preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain
- Sickle Cell Disease Genomics of Africa (SickleGenAfrica) Network: ethical framework and initial qualitative findings from community engagement in Ghana, Nigeria and Tanzania
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update
- Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities
- Genomic sovereignty and the African promise: mining the African genome for the benefit of Africa
- Navigating the ethical maze of genomics in Canada’s military