Article info
Clinical ethics
PAPER
Conscientious refusal in healthcare: the Swedish solution
- Correspondence to Professor Christian Munthe, Department of Philosophy, Liguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 200, Gothenburg SE-40530, Sweden; christian.munthe{at}gu.se
Citation
Conscientious refusal in healthcare: the Swedish solution
Publication history
- Received June 17, 2016
- Accepted August 15, 2016
- First published September 1, 2016.
Online issue publication
March 22, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (1 September 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
- Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey