Article Text

PDF
PAPER
A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination
  1. Jason Brennan
  1. Correspondence to Professor Jason Brennan, Department of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy, Georgetown University, 3700 O St NW, Washington DC 20057-0004, USA; jason.brennan{at}georgetown.edu

Abstract

This paper argues that mandatory, government-enforced vaccination can be justified even within a libertarian political framework. If so, this implies that the case for mandatory vaccination is very strong indeed as it can be justified even within a framework that, at first glance, loads the philosophical dice against that conclusion. I argue that people who refuse vaccinations violate the ‘clean hands principle’, a (in this case, enforceable) moral principle that prohibits people from participating in the collective imposition of unjust harm or risk of harm. In a libertarian framework, individuals may be forced to accept certain vaccines not because they have an enforceable duty to serve the common, and not because cost–benefit analysis recommends it, but because anti-vaxxers are wrongfully imposing undue harm upon others.

  • Political Philosophy
  • Public Policy
  • Rights
  • Right to Refuse Treatment

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.