Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Paper
The social value of candidate HIV cures: actualism versus possibilism
  1. Regina Brown1,
  2. Nicholas Greig Evans2
  1. 1Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nicholas Greig Evans, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Floor 14, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA Department of Philosophy University of Massachusetts, Lowell, 883 Broadway Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 nicholas_evans{at}uml.edu

Abstract

A sterilising or functional cure for HIV is a serious scientific challenge but presents a viable pathway to the eradication of HIV. Such an event would be extremely valuable in terms of relieving the burden of a terrible disease; however, a coordinated commitment to implement healthcare interventions, particularly in regions that bear the brunt of the HIV epidemic, is lacking. In this paper, we examine two strategies for evaluating candidate HIV cures, based on our beliefs about the likelihood of global implementation. We reject possibilist interpretations of social value that do not account for the likelihood that a plan to cure HIV will be followed through. We argue, instead, for an actualist ranking of options for action, which accounts for the likelihood that a cure will be low cost, scalable and easy to administer worldwide.

  • HIV Infection and AIDS
  • Research Ethics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.