Article info
PDFMini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
Commentary
Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Citation
Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- New tobacco and nicotine products in Latin America and the Caribbean: assessing the market and regulatory environment
- Moving targets: how the rapidly changing tobacco and nicotine landscape creates advertising and promotion policy challenges
- Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)
- Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review
- Trajectories of ENDS and cigarette use among dual users: analysis of waves 1 to 5 of the PATH Study
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: the need for continued regulatory innovation
- Changing patterns of cigarette and ENDS transitions in the USA: a multistate transition analysis of youth and adults in the PATH Study in 2015–2017 vs 2017–2019
- Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use
- “I’m both smoking and vaping”: a longitudinal qualitative study of US young adults who tried to quit smoking cigarettes by using electronic cigarettes
- Electronic nicotine delivery system use behaviour and loss of autonomy among American Indians: results from an observational study