Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics
What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
- Correspondence to Dr Eszter Kollar, International Political Theory, Normative Orders Cluster of Excellence, Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen 60323, Germany; eszter.kollar{at}normativeorders.net
Citation
What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
Publication history
- Received March 1, 2016
- Accepted March 8, 2016
- First published March 30, 2016.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- On emergencies and emigration: how (not) to justify compulsory medical service
- Empirical Bioethics and the Health ‘Brain-Drain’: a qualitative study of the experiential and ethical landscape of compulsory community service for a group of South African doctors
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- Relevant evidence, reasonable policy and the right to emigrate
- Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic
- The missing evidence in favour of restricting emigration
- Good medical ethics, justice and provincial globalism
- Human rights and HIV: rhetoric or determinants?
- Ethical issues in funding research and development of drugs for neglected tropical diseases