Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Correspondence to Dr Jonathan A Hughes, School of Law, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; j.a.hughes{at}keele.ac.uk
Citation
Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
Publication history
- Received June 19, 2015
- Revised January 14, 2016
- Accepted February 8, 2016
- First published February 25, 2016.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer