Article Text
Abstract
Despite 30 years of advocacy, the prevalence of non-therapeutic female genital alteration (FGA) in minors is stable in many countries. Educational efforts have minimally changed the prevalence of this procedure in regions where it has been widely practiced. In order to better protect female children from the serious and long-term harms of some types of non-therapeutic FGA, we must adopt a more nuanced position that acknowledges a wide spectrum of procedures that alter female genitalia. We offer a revised categorisation for non-therapeutic FGA that groups procedures by effect and not by process. Acceptance of de minimis procedures that generally do not carry long-term medical risks is culturally sensitive, does not discriminate on the basis of gender, and does not violate human rights. More morbid procedures should not be performed. However, accepting de minimis non-therapeutic f FGA procedures enhances the effort of compassionate practitioners searching for a compromise position that respects cultural differences but protects the health of their patients.
- Circumcision
- Sexuality/Gender
- Newborns and Minors
- Surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Supplementary materials
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Feature article
- The concise argument
- Commentary
Other content recommended for you
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Female genital mutilation: making the case for good practice
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Female genital mutilation: what every paediatrician should know
- Female genital mutilation in children presenting to a London safeguarding clinic: a case series
- Medicalisation of female genital mutilation is a dangerous development
- Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries