Responses
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ ‘Female genital alteration: a compromise solution’
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision