Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
A new method for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients: what do patients think about the use of a patient preference predictor?
- Correspondence to Dr David Wendler, NIH, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; dwendler{at}nih.gov
Citation
A new method for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients: what do patients think about the use of a patient preference predictor?
Publication history
- Received July 13, 2015
- Revised December 16, 2015
- Accepted January 7, 2016
- First published January 29, 2016.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision-making
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
- Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Experiences and perspectives related to shared decision-making among outpatients with degenerative joint disease in Taiwan: a qualitative study
- What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
- Exploring healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology
- Patient and physician perspectives guiding intra-articular treatment choice in knee osteoarthritis: stakeholders are aligned on treatment priorities but have different assessments of treatment effect
- Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice