Article Text
Research ethics
Response
Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by Hunter
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
- UK regulator is to take lighter approach to drug advertisements
- Delays in dealing with complaints against drug companies are growing, BMJ finds
- The whistleblowing drama behind Astellas’s suspension from the ABPI
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Unethical pharmaceutical marketing: a common problem requiring collective responsibility
- Clinical trials: Streamlined framework aims to boost UK research
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?