Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
  1. Christopher Kaczor
  1. Correspondence to Professor Christopher Kaczor, James Madison Program, Princeton University, 83 Prospect Avenue, Princeton, NJ 08540-5210, USA; kaczor{at}princeton.edu

Abstract

If we accept euthanasia for adults, should we also accept voluntary euthanasia for children? In ‘Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk about It?’, Luc Bovens answers this question affirmatively. Bovens examines five arguments against extending euthanasia to minors, the arguments being weightiness, capability of discernment, pressure, sensitivity and sufficient palliative care. He rejects each of these arguments. In this paper, I provide a rejoinder for each of his responses. I also critique his view that opponents of euthanasia have extra responsibility to promote palliative care. On the contrary, if euthanasia is legalised, advocates of euthanasia have a special obligation to promote improvements in palliative care.

  • Euthanasia
  • Palliative Care
  • Children
  • Informed Consent

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.