Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Response
Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
- Correspondence to Dr Rob Lawlor, Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied CETL, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; r.s.lawlor{at}leeds.ac.uk
Citation
Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
Publication history
- Received June 26, 2015
- Accepted July 29, 2015
- First published August 21, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 25, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 April 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics
- Response to: ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’ by Lawlor
- Translational ethics? The theory–practice gap in medical ethics
- How to teach moral theories in applied ethics
- Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
- What is the ethics of ageing?
- How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?
- On complicity and compromise: a reply