Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Paper
Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement
  1. Sarah Carter
  1. Correspondence to Sarah Carter, University of Manchester, School of Law, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; sarah.carter-4{at}postgrad.manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Concerns that people would be disinclined to voluntarily undergo moral enhancement have led to suggestions that an incentivised programme should be introduced to encourage participation. This paper argues that, while such measures do not necessarily result in coercion or undue inducement (issues with which one may typically associate the use of incentives in general), the use of incentives for this purpose may present a taboo trade-off. This is due to empirical research suggesting that those characteristics likely to be affected by moral enhancement are often perceived as fundamental to the self; therefore, any attempt to put a price on such traits would likely be deemed morally unacceptable by those who hold this view. A better approach to address the possible lack of participation may be to instead invest in alternative marketing strategies and remove incentives altogether.

  • Enhancement
  • Neuroethics
  • Behaviour Modification
  • Public Policy
  • Moral Psychology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.