Article info
PDFCommentary
Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- Correspondence to Brian D Earp, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; brian.earp{at}gmail.com
Citation
Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
Publication history
- Received May 26, 2015
- Accepted June 3, 2015
- First published June 23, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- Aiming towards “moral equilibrium”: health care professionals’ views on working within the morally contested field of antenatal screening
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrisian philosophy
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality