Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Commentary
Too much of a good thing
- Correspondence to Dr Zohar Lederman, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 129790, Singapore; zoharlederman{at}gmail.com
Citation
Too much of a good thing
Publication history
- Received September 19, 2014
- Accepted September 29, 2014
- First published October 23, 2014.
Online issue publication
November 16, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Heartstart Scotland: the use of paramedic skills in out of hospital resuscitation
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Perspectives of emergency department attendees on outcomes of resuscitation efforts: origins and impact on cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?—Ethics of calling codes
- Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- The value of taking an ‘ethics history’
- Code status discussions and goals of care among hospitalised adults
- Theory and practice of defibrillation: (2) defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation