Article info
PDFResponse
Addressing polarisation in science
- Correspondence to Brian D Earp, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; brian.earp{at}gmail.com
Citation
Addressing polarisation in science
Publication history
- Received May 7, 2015
- Accepted May 25, 2015
- First published June 22, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals
- Conflict of interest disclosure and the polarisation of scientific communities
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Improving researchers’ conflict of interest declarations
- Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform
- Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial
- Disclosures of funding sources and conflicts of interest in published HIV/AIDS research conducted in developing countries
- Conflicts of interest in clinical ethics consults