Article info
PDFViewpoint
Re-engineering shared decision-making
- Correspondence to Dr Muriel R Gillick, Department of Population Medicine/Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; mgillick{at}partners.org
Citation
Re-engineering shared decision-making
Publication history
- Received November 28, 2014
- Revised March 6, 2015
- Accepted April 13, 2015
- First published April 29, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care
- Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study
- Barriers and facilitators for goals of care discussions between residents and hospitalised patients
- Can shared decision making increase the uptake of evidence in clinical practice?
- Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Futility in acute care surgery: first do no harm
- Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity
- Initiating advance care planning at admission: a brief intervention to increase goals of care discussions in geriatric trauma patients in an urban level I trauma center
- Does a strategy to promote shared decision-making reduce medical practice variation in the choice of either single or double embryo transfer after in vitro fertilisation? A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial