Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study
- Correspondence to Dr Nicola Kerruish, Department of Women's and Children's Health and Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9013, New Zealand; nikki.kerruish{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study
Publication history
- Received November 4, 2013
- Revised May 27, 2014
- Accepted March 20, 2015
- First published April 9, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Agency, duties and the “Ashley treatment”
- Growth attenuation therapy: practice and perspectives of paediatric endocrinologists
- Ashley X: a difficult moral choice
- Parenting acceptance and commitment therapy: a randomised controlled trial of an innovative online course for families of children with cerebral palsy
- Substituted judgment, procreative beneficence, and the Ashley treatment
- #warriors: sick children, social media and the right to an open future
- Parenting, child development and primary care—‘Crescer em Grande!’ intervention (CeG!) based on the Touchpoints approach: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach
- Protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a dyadic expressive arts-based intervention in improving the psychosocial well-being of children with intellectual disability in special schools and their mothers
- The Ashley treatment: a step too far, or not far enough?