Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
A reply to critics of Creation Ethics
- Correspondence to Dr David DeGrazia, Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Rm 1C118, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA; ddd{at}gwu.edu
Citation
A reply to critics of Creation Ethics
Publication history
- Received October 10, 2014
- Accepted October 22, 2014
- First published February 17, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Creation Ethics and the harms of existence
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- In defence of newborns: a response to Kingma