Article Text
Author meets critics: response
DeGrazia on abortion law and policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Acknowledgments Thanks to John Coggon, Adrian Viens, and Jeremy Williams.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i Thanks to Jeremy Williams for the helpful discussions and suggestions. For a detailed critique of Rawlsian public reason and abortion see Jeremy Williams, Public Reason and Prenatal Moral Status. Journal of Ethics, forthcoming. He argues that Rawlsian public reason is far more permissive of abortion than is often presumed.
↵ii As quoted in John H. Richardson “The Abortion Ministry of Dr Willie Parker”. http://www.esquire.com/ features/abortion-ministry-of-dr-willie-parker-0914 (accessed 28 Sep 2014).
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: precis
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES* for Sister Sarah
- The place for individual conscience
- Response to: The human embryo in the Christian tradition
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- The Israeli abortion committees' process of decision making: an ethical analysis