Article info
End of life
‘Total disability’ and the wrongness of killing
- Correspondence to Adam Omelianchuk, Department of Philosophy (Box 59), The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; apo{at}email.sc.edu
Citation
‘Total disability’ and the wrongness of killing
Publication history
- Received May 19, 2014
- Revised July 24, 2014
- Accepted September 23, 2014
- First published October 16, 2014.
Online issue publication
July 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 October 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Killing and disabling: a comment on Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller
- A concise argument: on the wrongness of killing
- What makes killing wrong?
- Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Dependent relational animals
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule
- Strong's objections to the future of value account