Article Text
PDFReproductive ethics
Response
Response to Tomasz Zuradzki's ‘Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
-
↵i Brugger's article3 also contains a summary of the minority opposing view.
-
↵ii An earlier Church, document, Donum Vitae, echoes Dignitas Personae when describing the “absurd fate” that embryos are exposed to. See reference 6.
Linked Articles
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A situation of ethical limbo and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Bioethical dilemmas of assisted reproduction in the opinions of Polish women in infertility treatment: a research report
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Predictive genetic testing for neurodegenerative conditions: how should conflicting interests within families be managed?
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence