Article Text
Abstract
Objective To assess the issue of ‘retrospective consent’ among a cohort of patients who had survived with unfavourable outcome and to assess attitudes among next of kin regarding their role as surrogate decision makers.
Methods Twenty patients who had survived for at least 3 years with an unfavourable outcome following a decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury were assessed with their next of kin. During the course of a semistructured interview, participants were asked whether they would have provided consent if they had known their eventual outcome. They were also asked for general comments regarding all aspects of the clinical journey. Eighteen patients had next of kin who were available for interview. For two patients, there was no longer any family involvement.
Results Of the 20 patients, 13 were able to provide a response and 11 felt that they would have provided consent even if they had known their eventual outcome. Of the 18 next of kin who were able to express an opinion, 10 felt that they would have provided retrospective consent.
Conclusions Many patients appeared to have adapted to a level of disability that competent individuals might deem unacceptable. This does not necessarily mean that such outcomes should be regarded as ‘favourable’, nor that decompressive craniectomy must be performed for patients with predicted poor outcome. Nevertheless, those burdened with the initial clinical decisions and thereafter the long-term care of these patients may draw some support from the knowledge that unfavourable may not necessarily be unacceptable.
- Clinical Ethics
- Informed Consent
- Neuroethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Clinical ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury
- Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue
- Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury reduces mortality but increases survival with severe disability
- Acute subdural haematoma in the elderly: to operate or not to operate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following surgery
- Neurotrauma and the RUB: where tragedy meets ethics and science
- IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury: external validation in a South-American cohort
- Which treatments are safe and effective to reduce intracranial pressure following severe traumatic brain injury?
- Adverse events associated with microsurgial treatment for ruptured intracerebral aneurysms: a prospective nationwide study on subarachnoid haemorrhage in Sweden
- Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
- Traumatic brain injury in adults