Article info
PDFPublic health ethics
Commentary
Accommodating conscience in medicine
- Correspondence to Professor Roger Trigg, St. Cross College, University of Oxford, OX1 3LZ Oxford, UK; roger.trigg{at}theology.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Accommodating conscience in medicine
Publication history
- Received November 19, 2013
- Accepted December 7, 2013
- First published May 26, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Ethics briefings
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality