Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Paper
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
  1. Tomasz Żuradzki
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tomasz Żuradzki, Jagiellonian University, Institute of Philosophy, ul. Grodzka 52, Kraków 31-044, Poland; t.zuradzki{at}uj.edu.pl

Abstract

In this paper I present an argument in favour of a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I argue that if embryos created in vitro were able to decide for themselves in a rational manner, they would sometimes choose PGD as a method of selection. Couples, therefore, should respect their hypothetical choices on a principle similar to that of patient autonomy. My thesis shows that no matter which moral doctrine couples subscribe to, they ought to conduct the PGD procedure in the situations when it is impossible to implant all of the created embryos and if there is a significant risk for giving birth to a child with a serious condition.

  • Genetic Screening/Testing
  • In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Autonomy
  • Public Policy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles