Responses
Clinical ethics
Paper
Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 12 March 2015
- Published on: 12 March 2015Religion Vs Science towards Life and SurvivalShow More
With respect to all authors, I have read the article and the comments made in the e-letter. I agreed with Biggar to little extent. But one of the important point here is the reason of following religion Vs following the science. Religion is not only about the beliefs but also about the practices. It teaches us 24 hours way of passing life by giving us the heavenly or moral knowledge either with a concept of God or without...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Senior doctors' opinions of rational suicide
- Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life
- Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- On the relevance of an argument as regards the role of existential suffering in the end-of-life context