Article Text
Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate how public disclosure can be used to balance physicians' conscientious objections with their professional obligations to patients – specifically respect for patient autonomy and informed consent. It is argued here that physicians should be permitted to exercise conscientious objections, but that they have a professional obligation to provide advance notification to patients about those objections. It is further argued here that public disclosure is an appropriate and ethically justifiable limit to the principle of advance notification. The argument for publicly disclosing physicians' conscientious objections is made in this paper by discussing three practical benefits of public disclosure in medicine, and then addressing how publicly disclosing physicians' conscientious objections is not an undue invasion of privacy. Three additional concerns with public disclosure of physicians' conscientious objections are briefly addressed – potential harassment of physicians, workplace discrimination, and mischaracterising physicians' professional aptitude – concluding that each of these concerns requires further deliberation in the realm of business ethics.
- Applied and Professional Ethics
- Clinical Ethics
- Confidentiality/Privacy
- Conscientious Objection
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card