Article Text
Commentary
The Francis Inquiry: from diagnosis to treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests JAS was an expert adviser and witness to the Francis Inquiry, and an assessor of policy recommendations made by the Inquiry.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Clinical ethics
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after Mid Staffordshire
- Cardiac interventional procedures in the UK 1992 to 1996
- Cardiac intervention procedures in the United Kingdom 1997: developments in data collection
- Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation
- Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
- Duty of candour and communication during an infection control incident in a paediatric ward of a Scottish hospital: how can we do better?
- Coronary angioplasty: guidelines for good practice and training
- Multicentre prospective survey of SeHCAT provision and practice in the UK
- Improving compliance with the duty of candour: 5-year experience within an endoscopy department
- The future of gastroenterology: patient choice, patient voice