Article info
PDFCommentary
Comment on Levy's ‘Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it’
- Correspondence to Professor Jan Narveson, Department of Philosophy, and Department of Political Science, University of Waterloo, 57 Young Street West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 2Z4; jnarveso{at}watarts.uwaterloo.ca
Citation
Comment on Levy's ‘Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it’
Publication history
- Received February 7, 2013
- Accepted February 7, 2013
- First published December 9, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- “They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism
- Public health for paediatricians:How can behavioural economics help to make paediatric practice more effective?
- Abortion and regret